Poster Poster Program Therapy Physics

Impact of Motion on Dose Calculation Differences between Halcyon and Truebeam Hypersight Imaging Systems

Abstract
Purpose

To compare HyperSight imaging systems between O-ring (Halcyon) and C-arm (TrueBeam) machine, with specific emphasis on the impact of motion in resulting dose calculation.

Methods

Scans of the CIRS Lung Phantom were taken at two different locations with Halcyon and TrueBeam machines. Variations in motion settings were implemented, specifically time cycles (4s and 8s) and lengths of oscillations (5mm and 20mm), and an additional still condition. Before planning, the Halcyon and TrueBeam datasets were registered using the still images. The contours were drawn based on the known size of the target and the known amount of motion. Then, the treatment plan was created and optimized on the Halcyon dataset in Eclipse. The same plan was later copied onto the TrueBeam dataset and re-calculated. This process allowed the comparison between the dose differences caused only by imaging datasets. Finally, dose distributions were evaluated using 3D gamma analysis and DVHs calculated for the internal target volume (ITV) in Eclipse.

Results

3D gamma analysis and DVH graphs presented differences, even in the still condition. Once motion was introduced, these differences amplified. The 3D gamma pass rates decreased systematically with increasing amplitude (5mm to 20mm) and with longer cycle times (4s to 8s), and the DVH deviations followed the same trend. These differences in dose seen in the still and motion conditions indicate that the CT number differences between reconstruction protocols are the primary source of variation.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that dose calculation differences persist between Halcyon and TrueBeam HyperSight datasets even in the absence of motion, primarily due to differences in CT number reconstruction. These differences were non-negligible and became more pronounced under stricter evaluation criteria and increased motion conditions, indicating that care must be taken when using advanced CBCT imaging for dose calculation purposes.

People

Related

Similar sessions

Poster Poster Program
Jul 19 · 07:00
Python-Based Automation Framework for Annual Machine QA Data Archiving In Qatrack+

Annual water-tank measurements help ensure beam characteristics remain consistent with commissioning baselines. However, the lack of a standardized processing workflow and decentralized data storage makes it difficult to analyze...

Syed Bilal Ahmad, PhD
Therapy Physics 0 people interested
Poster Poster Program
Jul 19 · 07:00
User Expectations and Current Availability of HDR Brachytherapy Audits In Europe

The aim of this work was to evaluate the need to implement more dosimetric audits in high‐dose‐rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in Europe and to identify which characteristics such audits should meet according to users.

Javier Vijande, PhD Laura Oliver Cañamás
Therapy Physics 0 people interested