Poster Poster Program Therapy Physics

Safety and Precision In a Same-Day, MRI-Only Simulation with Adaptive VMAT SRS/SRT Workflow: Integrating Synthetic CT and AI-Driven Quality Assurance

Abstract
Purpose

The efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and radiotherapy (SRT) for brain metastases is often compromised by tumor growth and soft tissue changes between simulation and treatment. To eliminate these latencies, we clinically implemented a novel same-day workflow combining MRI-only simulation with non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for intracranial SRS/SRT. Here we report on the workflow design, commissioning, and the integration of a deep learning-based auto-segmentation tool as a Quality Assurance (QA) safety net.

Methods

On the day of treatment, patients undergo MRI simulation in the treatment position. Target definition is completed on a T1-weighted MPRAGE MRI. To mitigate the risk of missed lesions during the accelerated planning timeline, an AI auto-contouring prototype by Siemens was integrated to provide a "second check" for GTV detection and OAR delineation. Treatment planning is completed using MRI-defined targets with dose calculation and reference image generation based on a deep-learning-based FDA-approved synthetic CT (sCT) solution. A preliminary plan based on diagnostic imaging is adapted to the treatment-day anatomy and re-optimized (HyperArc/VMAT). Commissioning included: 1) dosimetric comparison of sCT vs. CT plans, 2) verification of CBCT-to-sCT positioning accuracy, and 3) validation of the AI-QA tool's sensitivity on a retrospective cohort of 436 patients.

Results

Dosimetric analysis demonstrated a D95% dose difference of -0.04±0.72% between sCT and CT plans, with Gamma indices exceeding 99% (1%/1mm). CBCT-to-sCT alignment achieved sub-millimeter accuracy. The AI-QA demonstrated a sensitivity of 93.3% for detecting metastases >0.1 cc with robust segmentation (median Dice >0.79).

Conclusion

The same-day MRI-only workflow is clinically feasible and robust. The integration of AI-driven contouring QA provides a safety layer, addressing the challenges of accelerated timelines by ensuring comprehensive target delineation. A trial to assess whether this workflow may allow for the safe omission of PTV margins through adaptation to anatomical changes is currently underway.

People
Marvin Kinz, MSPresenting Author · Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School Daniel C. Miller, MS, CMDAuthors · Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School Evangelia Kaza, PhDAuthors · Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School Thomas Ciavattone, BScAuthors · Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School Scott A. FriesenAuthors · Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School Vaisakh Nappady Joy, PhDAuthors · Siemens Healthineers Cassandra L. Bullens, RTTAuthors · Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School Maria A. Czerminska, MSAuthors · Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School Jürgen Hesser, PhDAuthors · Mannheim Institute for Intelligent Systems in Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim; Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing; Central Institute for Computer Engineering; CZS Heidelberg Center for Model-Based Ai; Heidelberg University Christian V. Guthier, PhDAuthors · Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School Atchar Sudhyadhom, PhDAuthors · Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School Jeremy S. Bredfeldt, PhDAuthors · Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School Ayal A. Aizer, MDAuthors · Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School Kamal Singhrao, PhDAuthors · Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School

Related

Similar sessions

Poster Poster Program
Jul 19 · 07:00
Python-Based Automation Framework for Annual Machine QA Data Archiving In Qatrack+

Annual water-tank measurements help ensure beam characteristics remain consistent with commissioning baselines. However, the lack of a standardized processing workflow and decentralized data storage makes it difficult to analyze...

Syed Bilal Ahmad, PhD
Therapy Physics 0 people interested
Poster Poster Program
Jul 19 · 07:00
User Expectations and Current Availability of HDR Brachytherapy Audits In Europe

The aim of this work was to evaluate the need to implement more dosimetric audits in high‐dose‐rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in Europe and to identify which characteristics such audits should meet according to users.

Javier Vijande, PhD Laura Oliver Cañamás
Therapy Physics 0 people interested