Poster Poster Program Therapy Physics

Log File-Based Efficient Machine Transfer Process for Patients Treated on Helical Delivery Systems

Abstract
Purpose

In clinics operating multiple helical delivery systems, treatment plan transfer between machines is frequently desired to improve scheduling flexibility. Despite beam matching, vendor guidance commonly recommends repeating full patient-specific IMRT QA after each plan transfer, increasing workload and consuming valuable treatment machine time. This work establishes an efficient and standardized machine-transfer workflow for helical delivery systems that maintains dosimetric accuracy and delivery confidence while reducing machine utilization.

Methods

A prospective transfer workflow was implemented for two Radixact® (Accuray) systems and applied to all patients scheduled on either machine. After physician approval, plans were transferred to the alternate machine on the Precision TPS. Transferred plan doses were exported to MIM (MIM Software) and compared with the original planned dose using gamma analysis (0.5mm/0.5%). Patient-specific IMRT QA (3mm/3%) was performed only for the original plan using ArcCheck (Sun Nuclear). Automated quality checklist items triggered in-air delivery of transferred plans on the destination machine. Delivered plans were reconstructed using gantry, couch, and MLC positional data from delivery log files, and dose reconstruction was performed in MIM SureCalc. Reconstructed doses were compared with transferred planned doses using gamma analysis (2mm/3%). Ten clinical cases (pelvis, prostate, pancreas, brain, head and neck, extremity) were evaluated, and workflow timing was recorded.

Results

Dose comparisons between original and transferred plans demonstrated excellent agreement (gamma pass rate: 98.83–99.91%). Log-file-based reconstructed dose comparisons showed passing rates of 91.01–100.00%. ArcCheck IMRT QA passing rates for transferred plans ranged from 95.5–100.0%. Plan reconstruction required <20 s, while SureCalc dose calculation required 3–11 min. Eliminating repeated phantom-based QA on the destination machine avoided approximately 15 min of additional machine time per patient.

Conclusion

This workflow enables safe and efficient machine transfer for helical delivery systems, improving treatment machine availability and operational flexibility while maintaining high dosimetric confidence.

People

Related

Similar sessions

Poster Poster Program
Jul 19 · 07:00
Python-Based Automation Framework for Annual Machine QA Data Archiving In Qatrack+

Annual water-tank measurements help ensure beam characteristics remain consistent with commissioning baselines. However, the lack of a standardized processing workflow and decentralized data storage makes it difficult to analyze...

Syed Bilal Ahmad, PhD
Therapy Physics 0 people interested
Poster Poster Program
Jul 19 · 07:00
User Expectations and Current Availability of HDR Brachytherapy Audits In Europe

The aim of this work was to evaluate the need to implement more dosimetric audits in high‐dose‐rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in Europe and to identify which characteristics such audits should meet according to users.

Javier Vijande, PhD Laura Oliver Cañamás
Therapy Physics 0 people interested