Poster Poster Program Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Physics

Thermal Modeling of Diagnostic X-Ray Tubes: Retrospective Monitoring and Prospective Protocol Evaluation

Abstract
Purpose

To retrospectively identify potential x-ray anode overheating events and to prospectively design protocols and policies to mitigate heat-related risks that can lead to tube downtime and workflow disruption.

Methods

A fifteen-month exposure timeline was constructed by linking acquisition and technique data extracted from DICOM metadata. Four x-ray tubes were modeled: Toshiba Tube E7252 at an urgent care site, Rotanode E7254 at a primary care site, and GE Healthcare MX100 at a primary care site and an inpatient site. Heating and cooling curves were modeled for each tube model, using manufacturer specified curves. Anode heat deposition and dissipation were calculated on a per-second basis. Anode heat load was evaluated to determine whether it exceeded 50% or 90% of the maximum heat capacity. The model was also applied prospectively as a protocol simulation tool for a 5-view lumbar spine study using a high mAs technique that varied timing between views and between consecutive studies.

Results

The maximum instantaneous heat load during the fifteen-month study period across all sites was 79.5% of the maximum heat capacity. Anode heat load exceeded the 50% threshold on twenty-eight occasions during the period. The 90% anode heat threshold was never exceeded. Prospective protocol simulations using the MX100 tube showed that, for a standard 5-view lumbar spine study with 30 second spacing between views and no repeats, a minimum interval of 3 minutes between studies was required to keep the cumulative heat load below 90% of maximum capacity. When a single repeat of the highest-energy view was included, the minimum safe interval increased to 8 minutes.

Conclusion

This modeling and simulation approach provides a practical tool for monitoring x-ray tube heating and evaluating protocol design. Prospective simulations allow sites to define minimum study spacing that maintains safe anode and tube housing temperatures for improved workflow planning.

People

Related

Similar sessions

Poster Poster Program
Jul 19 · 07:00
B-Trac – Breast Tissue Rotation and Compression Apparatus for Calibration

Mammography (compressed 2D) and MRI (uncompressed 3D) capture breast tissue under different conditions, complicating tumor localization across modalities. To bridge this gap, we developed a customizable physical platform to simul...

Dayadna Hernandez Perez
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Physics 0 people interested
Poster Poster Program
Jul 19 · 07:00
Comprehensive Medical Physics Assessment of Digital Mammography Equipment: A Three-Year Multi-Site Evaluation of Technical Performance and Radiation Safety at 24 Saudi Arabian Healthcare Institutions (2022–2024)

To conduct a comprehensive multi-center audit evaluating the technical performance, image quality, and radiation safety of digital mammography systems across 24 unique healthcare facilities in Saudi Arabia. This study aims to est...

Sami Alshaikh, PhD
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Physics 0 people interested
Poster Poster Program
Jul 19 · 07:00
Starting Small: Implementing a CT Protocol Optimization Program

This talk describes our organization’s CT optimization program, and how we implemented it to make efficient use of limited physicist time.

Robert J. Cropp, PhD
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Physics 0 people interested