Poster Poster Program Therapy Physics

Time Feasibility of Upfront "Brachy-like" SBRT Using Adapt-to-Shape Workflow with 1.5T MR-Linac for Cervical Cancer Definitive Radiotherapy

Abstract
Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility and adapt-to-shape (ATS) workflow efficiency of a novel UPFRONT "Brachy-like" Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) technique delivered via MR-LINAC. This upfront boost aims to deliver a steep-gradient high dose to a "Virtual-Tandem Core PTV" (VTC-PTV) and a moderate dose to the HR-CTV to promote immunopotentiation and tumor reduction prior to conventional chemoradiotherapy and brachytherapy.

Methods

Five treatment-naïve patients with intact-uterus cervical cancers previously treated on a 1.5T MR-LINAC (Elekta Unity) were retrospectively analyzed to maintain clinical relevance to the intended "UPFRONT" workflow. An "UPFRONT" scheme was replanned on the original planning CT. A 2-cm diameter VTC-PTV was generated along the central HR-CTV core using an automated central spline function. A single-fraction simultaneous integrated boost was prescribed: 8Gy to the VTC-PTV and 3Gy to the HR-CTV. IMRT plans (12-beam template) were optimized to meet stringent OAR constraints: Bladder D2cc <3Gy and Rectum/Sigmoid D2cc <2.2Gy. ATS workflow was implemented offline, with two medical physicists and two radiation oncologists on the treatment planning console. Workflow metrics, including registration, contouring, and optimization times, were recorded. Dosimetric consistency between the initial planning CT and post-adaptive plans was evaluated.

Results

The median (range) adaptive workflow times were: total adaptive planning time 7.8 (5.4–10.9) min; registration 1.1 (0.5–3.1) min; contouring 4.3 (2.2–6.4) min; and optimization 1.5 (1.3–3.3) min. The median estimated delivery time was 10.3 (9.6–12.6) min. No statistically significant dosimetric differences were observed between planning CT and post-adaptive plans with pre-/post- adaptive dose for VTC-PTV Dmax 11.8(10.1-12.9)/11.1(10.9-12.7) Gy, D90% 8.2(6.2-8.9)/7.8(6.3-8.8) Gy; HR-CTV D90% 3.2(3.1-3.4)/3.2(3.0-3.5) Gy; D2cc Bladder 2.7(2.5-2.7)/2.7(2.6-2.7) Gy, Rectum 1.8(1.5-1.9)/1.7(1.4-1.8) Gy, and Sigmoid 1.7 (0.7-2)/1.6(0.5-1.9) Gy.

Conclusion

Upfront MR-guided "Brachy-like" SBRT for cervical cancer is clinically feasible within a highly efficient time frame. The workflow is particularly optimized in treatment-naïve patients, supporting its role as a potential induction therapy.

People
Belinda LeeAuthors · The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Jinzhong Yang, PhDAuthors · The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Yusung Kim, PhDAuthors · Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Eun Young Han, PhDAuthors · The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Satawatchara Suwanprateep, MScPresenting Author · Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University Ann H. Klopp, MD, PhDAuthors · The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Tissana Prasartseree, MDCorrespondings · The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Jingwei Duan, PhDAuthors · The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Ratchapas Romrattaphan, MDAuthors · Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University Pongpop Tuntapakul, MDAuthors · Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University Paritt Wongtrakool, MScAuthors · Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University Sawanya Suwandee, MScAuthors · Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University Sajjaporn Pojai, MScAuthors · Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University Napatsorn Thumyongkit, MScAuthors · Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University Tanwiwat Jaikuna, PhDAuthors · Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University Pitchayut Nakkrasae, MScAuthors · Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University Wiwatchai Sittiwong, MDAuthors · The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Pittaya Dankulchai, MDAuthors · Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University Christopher L SpicerAuthors · The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Zhiqian H. Yu, PhDAuthors · Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Related

Similar sessions

Poster Poster Program
Jul 19 · 07:00
Python-Based Automation Framework for Annual Machine QA Data Archiving In Qatrack+

Annual water-tank measurements help ensure beam characteristics remain consistent with commissioning baselines. However, the lack of a standardized processing workflow and decentralized data storage makes it difficult to analyze...

Syed Bilal Ahmad, PhD
Therapy Physics 0 people interested
Poster Poster Program
Jul 19 · 07:00
User Expectations and Current Availability of HDR Brachytherapy Audits In Europe

The aim of this work was to evaluate the need to implement more dosimetric audits in high‐dose‐rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in Europe and to identify which characteristics such audits should meet according to users.

Javier Vijande, PhD Laura Oliver Cañamás
Therapy Physics 0 people interested