Poster Poster Program Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Physics

Further Tweaks to Peak Skin Dose Calculation

Abstract
Purpose

This study investigates correction factors commonly used in calculating peak skin dose (PSD) from IR procedures. Specifically, it examines 1- effect of patient-induced compression of the table/pad on transmission factors and, 2- the contribution of scatter from beams outside the skin patch of interest as a function of C-arm angulation.

Methods

For compression effects, transmission factors of table and pad were first measured with no object on table. A 32-cm CTDI phantom was then positioned just above an ionization chamber and supported by Styrofoam blocks. Measurements were performed at various kV/filter combinations and beam angulations. The phantom was then placed directly on the table pad and measurements repeated. Additional measurements were acquired with added weight to simulate very large patients. Lateral images were used to assess compression and adjust table height to maintain the chamber at isocenter. To evaluate off-center and out-of-field dose contributions, an anthropomorphic chest phantom was used with the chamber positioned beneath it. Fluoroscopy and acquisition runs were performed at angles ranging from -60° to +60° and using multiple fields of view (FOVs). For each run, the ratio of chamber-measured air-kerma to system-displayed air kerma (C/D) was calculated. Additionally, chamber location was recorded for each view angle.

Results

Compression of the table and pad increased transmission factors (including forward-scatter) by 8% to 15%, depending on beam quality and angle of incidence. For off-center and out-of-field contributions, the normalized C/D ratio decreased to approximately 0.7 at the field edge and ranged from 0.1 to 0.4 outside the field, depending on FOV and angulation. Manual PSD calculations for several patients demonstrated that neglecting these effects could result in up to ±20% inaccuracy.

Conclusion

These findings indicate that updates to current correction factors used in PSD calculations are warranted to improve accuracy, particularly for large patients and complex geometries.

People

Related

Similar sessions

Poster Poster Program
Jul 19 · 07:00
B-Trac – Breast Tissue Rotation and Compression Apparatus for Calibration

Mammography (compressed 2D) and MRI (uncompressed 3D) capture breast tissue under different conditions, complicating tumor localization across modalities. To bridge this gap, we developed a customizable physical platform to simul...

Dayadna Hernandez Perez
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Physics 0 people interested
Poster Poster Program
Jul 19 · 07:00
Comprehensive Medical Physics Assessment of Digital Mammography Equipment: A Three-Year Multi-Site Evaluation of Technical Performance and Radiation Safety at 24 Saudi Arabian Healthcare Institutions (2022–2024)

To conduct a comprehensive multi-center audit evaluating the technical performance, image quality, and radiation safety of digital mammography systems across 24 unique healthcare facilities in Saudi Arabia. This study aims to est...

Sami Alshaikh, PhD
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Physics 0 people interested
Poster Poster Program
Jul 19 · 07:00
Starting Small: Implementing a CT Protocol Optimization Program

This talk describes our organization’s CT optimization program, and how we implemented it to make efficient use of limited physicist time.

Robert J. Cropp, PhD
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Physics 0 people interested