Poster Poster Program Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Physics

Comparing CT Scan Organ and Effective Dose Estimates from Radiation Dose Index Monitoring Systems (RDIMs) across Institutions Using a Reference Set of Patient Datasets

Abstract
Purpose

Radiation Dose Index Monitoring Systems (RDIMs) can report and track estimated organ and effective doses from CT scans. However, the methods to estimate these doses are not standardized. The purpose of this initial study was to assess the feasibility of performing direct comparisons of organ and effective dose estimates from several RDIMs using a reference set of patient datasets.

Methods

Under IRB approval, seven deidentified reference datasets were created and shared across sites: 4 routine thoracic scans and 3 routine abdomen/pelvis CT scans. For each exam, the dataset included: (a) Planning CT Radiograph; (b) Cross sectional CT image data; (c) Radiation Dose Structured Report (RDSR) and (d) Patient Protocol Page. Four sites used their RDIM to produce organ and effective dose estimates for each case. Estimates were compared by calculating the mean value of each organ and effective dose across RDIMs and then the average absolute percent difference (AAPD) across estimates. This was repeated for each estimated organ and effective dose for each patient.

Results

Estimates were provided from two different RDIMs (three sites had the same RDIM product). Mean effective dose estimates across datasets ranged from 6.88 to 12.14 mSV and AAPD of effective doses ranged from 0.1 to 22.9%. The AAPD for key organ dose estimates were: (a) 9.5 to 25.7% for breast and lung doses in thoracic scans; and; (b) 2.5 to 13.9% for colon and stomach doses in abdomen/pelvis scans. For the three sites using the same RDIM product, AAPDs were < 3% for key organ dose estimates and < 4% for effective dose estimates, respectively.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated the feasibility of performing direct comparisons of organ and effective dose estimates using a reference set of patient datasets. Future work will investigate sources of observed differences in RDIM results and possible mitigation strategies.

People

Related

Similar sessions

Poster Poster Program
Jul 19 · 07:00
B-Trac – Breast Tissue Rotation and Compression Apparatus for Calibration

Mammography (compressed 2D) and MRI (uncompressed 3D) capture breast tissue under different conditions, complicating tumor localization across modalities. To bridge this gap, we developed a customizable physical platform to simul...

Dayadna Hernandez Perez
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Physics 0 people interested
Poster Poster Program
Jul 19 · 07:00
Comprehensive Medical Physics Assessment of Digital Mammography Equipment: A Three-Year Multi-Site Evaluation of Technical Performance and Radiation Safety at 24 Saudi Arabian Healthcare Institutions (2022–2024)

To conduct a comprehensive multi-center audit evaluating the technical performance, image quality, and radiation safety of digital mammography systems across 24 unique healthcare facilities in Saudi Arabia. This study aims to est...

Sami Alshaikh, PhD
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Physics 0 people interested
Poster Poster Program
Jul 19 · 07:00
Starting Small: Implementing a CT Protocol Optimization Program

This talk describes our organization’s CT optimization program, and how we implemented it to make efficient use of limited physicist time.

Robert J. Cropp, PhD
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Physics 0 people interested