Poster Poster Program Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Physics

Normalization of Trabecular Bone Attenuation across Kvp Values: A Physics-Based Correction for Opportunistic Screening of Osteoporosis

Abstract
Purpose

To develop and validate a physics‑informed model that converts trabecular bone attenuation (HU) measured at non‑standard tube potentials into 120‑kVp–equivalent CT numbers.

Methods

X‑ray spectra at 100, 120, and 140 kVp were simulated using the TASMICS model with 3.6 mm Al + 0.1 mm Cu inherent filtration and 0.5 mm Cu added filtration (120‑kVp mean energy: 71 keV). Effective linear attenuation coefficients for trabecular bone (solid bone and marrow components) were computed by weighting NIST‑tabulated mass attenuation coefficients by these spectra. Model validation used an age‑thresholded cohort (>60 years) of non‑contrast abdominal CT scans (N=16,747) acquired across multiple scanner vendors, multiple generations of hardware, and encompassing all abdominal imaging protocols. Trabecular attenuation at L1 was extracted using an automated deep‑learning pipeline. Model performance was evaluated by comparing 100‑kVp and 140‑kVp trabecular attenuation distributions against 120‑kVp references using Welch’s t‑tests (α=0.05).

Results

The correction model successfully shifted non‑standard tube‑potential distributions toward the 120‑kVp baseline (120‑kVp mean: 140.9 HU). For the 140‑kVp cohort, the mean increased from 131.3 to 138.3 HU, with pre‑correction statistical differences (p<0.001) eliminated after correction (p=0.058). For the 100‑kVp cohort, the mean decreased from 148.1 to 137.3 HU, and significant pre‑correction differences (p=0.032) were similarly eliminated post‑correction (p=0.270).

Conclusion

This physics‑informed correction model effectively normalizes trabecular bone attenuation acquired at higher or lower tube potentials to 120‑kVp–equivalent values. The approach supports standardized bone density monitoring and enables robust opportunistic screening for bone disease using CT studies acquired under non‑standard imaging protocols.

People

Related

Similar sessions

Poster Poster Program
Jul 19 · 07:00
B-Trac – Breast Tissue Rotation and Compression Apparatus for Calibration

Mammography (compressed 2D) and MRI (uncompressed 3D) capture breast tissue under different conditions, complicating tumor localization across modalities. To bridge this gap, we developed a customizable physical platform to simul...

Dayadna Hernandez Perez
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Physics 0 people interested
Poster Poster Program
Jul 19 · 07:00
Comprehensive Medical Physics Assessment of Digital Mammography Equipment: A Three-Year Multi-Site Evaluation of Technical Performance and Radiation Safety at 24 Saudi Arabian Healthcare Institutions (2022–2024)

To conduct a comprehensive multi-center audit evaluating the technical performance, image quality, and radiation safety of digital mammography systems across 24 unique healthcare facilities in Saudi Arabia. This study aims to est...

Sami Alshaikh, PhD
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Physics 0 people interested
Poster Poster Program
Jul 19 · 07:00
Starting Small: Implementing a CT Protocol Optimization Program

This talk describes our organization’s CT optimization program, and how we implemented it to make efficient use of limited physicist time.

Robert J. Cropp, PhD
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Physics 0 people interested