Poster Poster Program Therapy Physics

In silico Patient-Specific Quality Assurance for Rapidarc Dynamic Breast Treatments

Abstract
Purpose

Measurement-based patient-specific QA is often impractical in adaptive workflows, motivating the use of complexity metrics. For tumor-site-specific class solutions [NCS 35], consistent beam characteristics allow the definition of targeted complexity thresholds to assess plan consistency. Building on prior results, this study performs a longitudinal beam-level analysis of complexity metric variation for a RapidArc Dynamic (RAD) breast class solution.

Methods

52 RAD breast plans were retrospectively analyzed: 20 plans (10 commissioning validated with IC/film and 10 clinical validated with EPID) formed the training set, and 32 clinical plans served as the validation set. Prescriptions consisted of 15x2.67Gy to the whole breast with a 3.2Gy SIB using 6X-FFF energy. Plans included one RAD sub-arc with two static ports and an avoidance sector to limit lung dose, and a second VMAT sub-arc with fixed collimator angle (10°) for boost delivery. Statistical process control (SPC) limits [TG-218] were derived per beam from the training set for 4 metrics: MU per dose per fraction (MU/dose/fx), leaf sequence variability (LSV), aperture area variability (AAV), and equivalent square field size (EqFS). To accommodate non-normal distributions, robust control limits were defined using the median and a robust variability estimate based on the Median Absolute Deviation. Validation-set plans with fewer than 6/8 metrics within expected variation were considered outliers.

Results

Expected variations were narrow and beam-specific. For the RAD beam, MU/dose/fx, LSV, AAV and EqFS ranges were [167.825-222.952], [0.828-0.917], [0.267-0.444], and [32.248-55.296], respectively. Corresponding VMAT beam ranges were [71.583-125.673], [0.572-0.835], [0.053-0.404], and [11.177-28.581]. In the validation cohort, 93.8% of plans met the ≥6/8 metric criterion.

Conclusion

Beam-specific, complexity-based SPC limits captured systematic differences between RAD and VMAT beams in a RAD breast class solution, enabling targeted, beam-level QA thresholds. This approach supports efficient screening of class solution compliance. Further research will explore expected complexity variation in adaptive settings.

People

Related

Similar sessions

Poster Poster Program
Jul 19 · 07:00
Python-Based Automation Framework for Annual Machine QA Data Archiving In Qatrack+

Annual water-tank measurements help ensure beam characteristics remain consistent with commissioning baselines. However, the lack of a standardized processing workflow and decentralized data storage makes it difficult to analyze...

Syed Bilal Ahmad, PhD
Therapy Physics 0 people interested
Poster Poster Program
Jul 19 · 07:00
User Expectations and Current Availability of HDR Brachytherapy Audits In Europe

The aim of this work was to evaluate the need to implement more dosimetric audits in high‐dose‐rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in Europe and to identify which characteristics such audits should meet according to users.

Javier Vijande, PhD Laura Oliver Cañamás
Therapy Physics 0 people interested